Tommy, you definately know where all the courthouses are. You know where the judges lock themselves in the toilet when they are jerking off. I’d send you to the courthouse to deliver amended complaints, motions, and briefs, there’s a very nice clerk with a perfectly SQUARE HEAD who stamps the amended complaints very, very meticulously as if he was taught how to do that in special ed, and then he hands me my file copy…you’d dig him…but with the JUDGES, you could wear stiletto heels and a little black dress up there and make them all so very jealous. The role model for an avant-garde judge…dressed in black.
@forwhomthebelsentolls - See this is one of the advantages you licensed mouthpieces have over the ‘Pro se throw it away’ – viz., Judges actually allow you to amend complaints in re substantive/substantial issues/matter as opposed to ‘i spelled your name wrong your Holy Majesty please allow me to lick the floor before everyone in open court … if it please the court. So even though amendment as such has always been allowed and in fact part of procedural due process after the answer ( see Blackstone Vol. 3 on procedure); but innovations have crept in under the pretence of such things as ‘judicial economy’. So sometime or the other NYS adopted CPLR 3025 placing conditions on amendment. However the 2nd Circuit allows pro se to amend once of course at any time ( O how nice and Liberal it appears on paper) - the big dif is “the futility rule” which Judges apply to me immediately after I file a complaint. How do they do this? Well Hon. Norman A. Mordue of NDNY who is now Presiding Judge wrote me a letter before the complaints were even served threatening to dismiss the complaint against two parties unless I showed blah blah blah. I had to remind him that in order for him to be able to do sua sponte motion for summary judgment with constructive notice that the complaint had to at least be served (see FRCP 56) from that point on he did everything imagineable to sabotage my case. So I did a Rule 21 at the 2nd Circuit. Well everything was going great – I used to be a telephone solicitor – until they found out I was a Pro se. I went from an older administrative attorney who was warming his hands buttering my cock practically talking the jizz right out of me to some hard ass Puerto Rican fuckhole that handled prisoner petitions from Riker’s Island. I had a great panel the cream of the crop – I was still paying large to the WJC, DSCC and Al Gore …. well you get the idea. And in fact the process you describe I had to threaten the Clerk several times with a CPLR Article 78 Special Proceeding in order for them to file my complaint after they took my money and was actually sued by the Village under the false pretence that I attempted to file complaints without paying the filing fee. I’ll tell you Belsen you can’t believe what it looks like through the Pro se eyes and yet almost every pro se complaint I’ve seen or heard about (except the ones actually accepted?) appear to have been done by psychos who forgot to take their meds. I don’t deserve this in fact I know sooo much more than the typical attorney and yet I’m thrown in the stockyard with the other pro se “/ ~~~~~~~
oXo ♥♥
that’s serious.
@SignificanceOfTheMightyClit - It’s discussed somewhat in Douglas v California (circa 1947) I have the cite in the front house – you can read it on FindLaw if you can figure out what case it is (lots by that name) William O. Douglas wrote for the majority.
Just saved this to my computer…lve those Floyd flowers
Was just gonna RYC, now i gotta go back and look because i’m listening to Paulia Gloria on the Stern replay
wtf…that is awesome…where the hell do u find shyt like that?
Comments (7)
Tommy, you definately know where all the courthouses are. You know where the judges lock themselves in the toilet when they are jerking off. I’d send you to the courthouse to deliver amended complaints, motions, and briefs, there’s a very nice clerk with a perfectly SQUARE HEAD who stamps the amended complaints very, very meticulously as if he was taught how to do that in special ed, and then he hands me my file copy…you’d dig him…but with the JUDGES, you could wear stiletto heels and a little black dress up there and make them all so very jealous. The role model for an avant-garde judge…dressed in black.
Randy
@forwhomthebelsentolls - where do I sleep !!
~~~~~~~
oXo
♥♥
@forwhomthebelsentolls - See this is one of the advantages you licensed mouthpieces have over the ‘Pro se throw it away’ – viz., Judges actually allow you to amend complaints in re substantive/substantial issues/matter as opposed to ‘i spelled your name wrong your Holy Majesty please allow me to lick the floor before everyone in open court … if it please the court. So even though amendment as such has always been allowed and in fact part of procedural due process after the answer ( see Blackstone Vol. 3 on procedure); but innovations have crept in under the pretence of such things as ‘judicial economy’. So sometime or the other NYS adopted CPLR 3025 placing conditions on amendment. However the 2nd Circuit allows pro se to amend once of course at any time ( O how nice and Liberal it appears on paper) - the big dif is “the futility rule” which Judges apply to me immediately after I file a complaint. How do they do this? Well Hon. Norman A. Mordue of NDNY who is now Presiding Judge wrote me a letter before the complaints were even served threatening to dismiss the complaint against two parties unless I showed blah blah blah. I had to remind him that in order for him to be able to do sua sponte motion for summary judgment with constructive notice that the complaint had to at least be served (see FRCP 56) from that point on he did everything imagineable to sabotage my case. So I did a Rule 21 at the 2nd Circuit. Well everything was going great – I used to be a telephone solicitor – until they found out I was a Pro se. I went from an older administrative attorney who was warming his hands buttering my cock practically talking the jizz right out of me to some hard ass Puerto Rican fuckhole that handled prisoner petitions from Riker’s Island. I had a great panel the cream of the crop – I was still paying large to the WJC, DSCC and Al Gore …. well you get the idea. And in fact the process you describe I had to threaten the Clerk several times with a CPLR Article 78 Special Proceeding in order for them to file my complaint after they took my money and was actually sued by the Village under the false pretence that I attempted to file complaints without paying the filing fee. I’ll tell you Belsen you can’t believe what it looks like through the Pro se eyes and yet almost every pro se complaint I’ve seen or heard about (except the ones actually accepted?) appear to have been done by psychos who forgot to take their meds. I don’t deserve this in fact I know sooo much more than the typical attorney and yet I’m thrown in the stockyard with the other pro se “/
~~~~~~~
oXo
♥♥
that’s serious.
@SignificanceOfTheMightyClit - It’s discussed somewhat in Douglas v California (circa 1947) I have the cite in the front house – you can read it on FindLaw if you can figure out what case it is (lots by that name) William O. Douglas wrote for the majority.
Just saved this to my computer…l
ve those Floyd flowers
Was just gonna RYC, now i gotta go back and look because i’m listening to Paulia Gloria on the Stern replay
wtf…that is awesome…where the hell do u find shyt like that?